A RISE in the number of armed police responding to incidents does not mean the county is less safe, police have said.
Figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show that in 2010 there were 88 incidents officers attended with firearms, then 271 in 2011 and 406 in 2012. So far this year, there have been 136 incidents.
But police say the decision to send armed officers to an incident is never taken lightly.
They also stress that the presence of their officers with firearms will help to prevent some incidents becoming more serious.
Assistant Chief Constable Richard Berry said: "Crime continues to fall in the county but it is important that the constabulary is prepared to respond effectively to potentially dangerous situations so that the public are kept safe and our officers are protected.
"On the vast majority of occasions where our armed officers have attended an incident, their presence alone has diffused or calmed the situation and occasions where a firearm is discharged are rare.
"The decision to discharge a firearm or Taser is never one that is made lightly. Our officers are trained to decide on what the appropriate and reasonable force is for the specific circumstances and to ensure that the level of force used is the minimum necessary."
So what does the law say about when officers can be armed? They can only do so when authorised by the Chief Officer. Individual officers do not need licences as long as they are trained and authorised. This is also set out in the Association of Chief Police Officers' manual of guidance on armed officers.
Gloucestershire police currently have around 100 officers who have passed a course to prepare them to carry and use firearms.
The county force's policy is to only deploy armed officers if officers feel they have to protect themselves or others from someone who has, or has access to, a potentially lethal weapon. They can also be deployed in response to a specific threat or to destroy animals that are dangerous or suffering unnecessarily.